Preview

Научно-практическая ревматология

Расширенный поиск

Классификационные критерии подагры (рекомендации ACR/EULAR)

https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2015-581-585

Полный текст:

Аннотация

Рассмотрены новые классификационые критерии подагры, утвержденные Советом директоров Американской коллегии ревматологов (АCR) и Исполнительным комитетом Европейской антиревматической лиги (EULAR). Критерии созданы на основе количественнной оценки данных, полученных при обследовании пациента, и имеют высокие чувствительность (92%) и специфичность (89%). Данные классификационные критерии позволят стандартизировать подход к формированию относительно однородных групп пациентов, имеющих клинические признаки подагры, для включения в исследования.

Об авторе

М. С. Елисеев
ФГБНУ Научно-исследовательский институт ревматологии им. В.А. Насоновой, Москва, Россия 115522 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 34А
Россия


Список литературы

1. Neogi T, Jansen T, Dalbeth N, et al. 2015 Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(10):1789–98. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208237

2. Zhang W, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: Diagnosis. Report of a task force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(10):1301–11. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.055251

3. Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout Part II. Management. Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for international clinical studies including therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Oct;65(10):1312–24. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.055269

4. Khanna D, Fitzgerald JD, Khanna PP, et al. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: Systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Oct;64(10):1431–46. doi: 10.1002/acr.21772

5. Khanna D, Khanna PP, Fitzgerald JD, et al. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: Therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(10):1447–61. doi: 10.1002/acr.21773

6. Hamburger M, Baraf HS, Adamson TC 3rd, et al. 2011 Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of gout and hyperuricemia. Postgrad Med. 2011;123(6 Suppl 1):3–36. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.11.2511

7. Sivera F, Andres M, Carmona L, et al. Multinational evidencebased recommendations for the diagnosis and management of gout: integrating systematic literature review and expert opinion of a broad panel of rheumatologists in the 3e initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(2):328–35. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203325

8. Juraschek SP, Kovell LC, Miller ER, Gelber FC. Gout, urate lowering therapy and uric acid levels among US adults. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Apr;67(4):588–92. doi: 10.1002/acr.22469

9. Елисеев МС, Барскова ВГ, Денисов ИС. Динамика клинических проявлений подагры у мужчин (данные 7-летнего ретроспективного наблюдения). Терапевтический архив. 2015;87(5):10–5 [Eliseev MS, Barskova VG, Denisov IS. The dynamics of clinical manifestations of gout in men (data from 7-year retrospective surveillance). Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2015;87(5):10–5 (In Russ.)].

10. Насонова ВА, Барскова ВГ. Ранние диагностика и лечение подагры – научно обоснованное требование улучшения трудового и жизненного прогноза больных. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2004;(1):5–7 [Nasonova VA, Barskova VG. Early diagnosis and treatment of gout – scientifically justified requirement of improving employment and life prognosis of patients. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya = Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2004;(1):5–7 (In Russ.)].

11. McGill NW. Gout and other crystal-associated arthropathies. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000 Sep;14(3):445–60. doi: 10.1053/berh.2000.0087

12. Saseen JJ. Comparison of patient characteristics and gout-related health-care resource utilization and costs in patients with frequent versus infrequent gouty arthritis attacks. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(11):2004–12. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes183

13. Елисеев МС. Алгоритм диагностики и лечения подагры. Русский медицинский журнал. 2015;23(7):410–4 [Eliseev MS. Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of gout. Russkii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2015;23(7):410–4 (In Russ.)].

14. Johnson SR, Goek ON, Singh-Grewal D, et al. Classification criteria in rheumatic diseases: a review of methodologic properties. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1119–33. doi: 10.1002/art.23018

15. Choi HK, Atkinson K, Karlson EW, et al. Alcohol intake and risk of incident gout in men: a prospective study. Lancet. 2004;363(9417):1277–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16000-5

16. Johnson SR, Goek ON, Singh-Grewal D, et al. Classification criteria in rheumatic diseases: A review of methodologic properties. Arthritis Care Res. 2007;57(7):1119–33. doi: 10.1002/art.23018

17. Janssens HJEM, Janssen M, van de Lisdonk EH, et al. Limited validity of the American College of Rheumatology criteria for classifying patients with gout in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(6):1255–6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.123687

18. Malik A, Schumacher HR, Dinnella JE, Clayburne GM. Clinical diagnostic criteria for gout: comparison with the gold standard of synovial fluid crystal analysis. JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. 2009;15(1):22–4. doi: 10.1097/rhu.0b013e3181945b79

19. Taylor WJ, Fransen J, Dalbeth N, et al. Performance of classification criteria for gout in early and established disease. Ann Rheum Dis 2014. pii: annrheumdis-2014-206364. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206364 [Epub ahead of print].

20. Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Jansen TL, et al. New classification criteria for gout: a framework for progress. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52:1748–53. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket154

21. Prowse RL, Dalbeth N, Kavanaugh A, et al. A Delphi exercise to identify characteristic features of gout – opinions from patients and physicians, the first stage in developing new classification criteria. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:498–505. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121037

22. Taylor W, Fransen J, Jansen TL, et al. Study for Updated GoutClassification Criteria (SUGAR): identification of features to classify gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Mar 6. doi: 10.1002/acr.22585 [Epub ahead of print].

23. Filippucci E, Di Geso L, Grassi W. Tips and tricks to recognize microcrystalline arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51 Suppl 7:vii18–21. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes332

24. Naredo E, Uson J, Jimenez-Palop M, et al. Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout? Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1522–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203487


Для цитирования:


Елисеев М.С. Классификационные критерии подагры (рекомендации ACR/EULAR). Научно-практическая ревматология. 2015;53(6):581-585. https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2015-581-585

For citation:


Eliseev M.S. GOUT CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA (ACR/EULAR GUIDELINES). Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2015;53(6):581-585. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1995-4484-2015-581-585

Просмотров: 1406


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-4484 (Print)
ISSN 1995-4492 (Online)